POSTED: 10 JANUARY 2006 - 2:00pm HST

We may only have 20 years to correct climate change

Simulation of melting of arctic sea ice. Image: Michael Böttinger / DKRZ / Max Planck Society

Rapidly shrinking Arctic ice -
it spells trouble for the rest of the world

by Robert S. Boyd on 10 January 2006 for Knight Ridder Newspapers

Alarmed by an accelerating loss of ice in the Arctic Ocean, scientists are striving to understand why the speedup is happening and what it means for humankind.
If present trends continue, as seems likely, the sea surrounding the North Pole will be completely free of ice in the summertime within the lifetime of a child born today. The loss could point the way to radical changes in the Earth's climate and weather systems.

Some researchers, such as Ron Lindsay, an Arctic scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle, fear that the polar region already may have passed a "tipping point" from which it can't recover in the foreseeable future.

Others, such as Jonathan Overpeck, the director of the Institute for the Study of Planet Earth at the University of Arizona in Tucson, think the Arctic ice pack is nearing a point of no return but hasn't reached it yet.

The National Science Foundation, a congressionally chartered agency, last month announced an urgent research program to determine what "these changes mean for both the Arctic and the Earth."

"The pace of Arctic change has accelerated," the foundation declared. "Because of the Arctic's pivotal role in the Earth's climate, it is critical - perhaps urgent - that we understand this system in light of abundant evidence that a set of linked and pervasive changes are under way."

The concern has heightened because last summer brought a record low in the size of the northern ice pack. "The degree of retreat was greater than ever before," said Ted Scambos, chief scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo. Previous lows were set in 2002, 2003 and 2004.

Since 1980, satellite observations taken each September, the warmest month of the year in the Arctic, show that the ice cover has been shrinking by an average of almost 8 percent a year. During that time, the polar ocean lost 540,000 square miles of ice - an area twice the size of Texas, Scambos said.

As a result, ships were able to sail freely, without the usual aid of an icebreaker, across the northern rim of Siberia last summer. Polar bears and Inuit natives found it harder to hunt and fish on the dwindling ice.

In addition to covering a smaller area of the ocean, the remaining ice is getting thinner. Submarine measurements indicate that the central ice pack thinned by 40 percent from the 1960s to the 1990s, Lindsay reported in the November issue of the Journal of Climate.

Scientists say the great Arctic thaw will have effects all over the world, not just in the frozen north. It will magnify the global warming trend that's been recorded for the last quarter-century. It'll reshape the Earth's weather systems in unknown ways. It could alter the pattern of ocean circulation, drastically changing Europe's climate.

"Loss of ice on land is also taking place at an accelerating rate, and this means sea levels will rise globally," Lindsay said. "Places like New Orleans will become even less viable."

There are two main reasons for the loss of Arctic sea ice, one external and one internal.

The external cause is the rise in the Earth's temperature, aggravated by increased emissions of carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse" gases, which trap the sun's heat.

Since 1978, the Arctic atmosphere has warmed seven times faster than the average warming trend in the southern two-thirds of the globe, John Christy, the director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, reported last week.

Satellite data show that average temperatures over the Arctic spiked upward by 2.1 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 27 years, Christy said, while inching up by less than three-tenths of a degree in southern climes.

"I believe the retreat of sea ice in the Arctic is very likely a manifestation of human-caused global warming," Overpeck said. "Global temperature increases are accelerating, and so is sea-ice retreat. Humans are almost certainly the cause of the change in the Arctic."

The internal cause for the loss of sea ice may be even more alarming. Scientists say the polar ice pack will continue to be in trouble whether or not global temperatures continue to rise.

"Even if temperatures and conditions went flat from this point forward, we anticipate that Arctic ice would eventually disappear," Scambos said.

The reason is that ice and snow, like any light-colored surface, reflect heat from the sun. As the ice shrinks, it leaves more open, darker water to absorb the sun's heat. More open water slows the formation of fresh ice in the fall and leads to a still earlier, more extensive melt the following summer.

"One of the big factors is the increasing melt in summer and the increasing amount of heat absorbed by the ice-free portions of the Arctic Ocean," Lindsay said. It's a "self-reinforcing feedback process."

Last year's record ice loss "provides further evidence that the system is on a track to this new state," said Jennifer Francis, an Arctic expert at the Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences at Rutgers University in Highlands, N.J.

The worrisome feedback process is almost certain to continue.

"A large group of Arctic system and climate specialists could not find any natural mechanism that could slow the change," Overpeck said. "To hope for salvation from Mother Nature is to hope on long odds."

"This is a new world for the Arctic," Scambos said.

see also:



We may only have 20 years to correct climate change

8 January 2006 - 9:30pm

Pejar Dam is 10 percent of capacity and the main water supply for Goulburn Australia

Scientist Urges Deep Cuts in Emissions
by Meraiah Foley on 6 January 2006 for the Associated Press

A leading Australian scientist believes the world has just 20 years to turn the tide on global warming and that leaders at a summit in Sydney next week must take concrete steps to tackle the problem.

Tim Flannery, a respected Australian scientist and author, says the world's economic powerhouses must take drastic measures over the next two decades before Earth's climate is irreversibly altered.

"We have to make deep, deep reductions in emissions within the next 20 years," he told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. "We will have won or lost the battle for climate stability in that time."

Flannery's projection is based on the period he says it will take — at current emissions levels — to pump out enough carbon dioxide to warm the globe by around two degrees, producing "catastrophic" climate change.

Prof. Will Steffen, the director of environmental studies at Canberra's respected Australian National University, said Flannery's prediction is a "worst case" scenario, but is "not impossible."

"Certainly we're seeing evidence of global warming. The evidence is quite clear now that the planet is warming compared to the baseline temperature change over the last few thousand years," Steffen said. "It's been warming quite rapidly over the last century and particularly over the last couple of decades, those observations are quite clear."

Next week, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is scheduled to meet with top-level officials from Australia, China, India, South Korea and Japan to discuss ways of tackling the issue.

Along with the U.S. these countries account for nearly half the world's population, energy and economic output.

The White House says the talks will enhance rather than replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on global warming that both the U.S. and Australia rejected because of its mandatory cuts in carbon dioxide, methane and other gases.

The Kyoto treaty calls for 35 industrialized countries to cut their 1990 emissions levels by at least 5 percent by 2012."

China and India signed the treaty as developing nations, exempting them from the first round of emissions cuts. Japan must cut emissions by 6 percent below 1990 levels, and South Korea by 5 percent.

So far, little is known about the goals of the "Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate."

In July, the group issued a vision statement that talks of developing, deploying and transferring technologies such as nuclear power and clean coal technology in which greenhouse gases are extracted and eliminated while burning coal.

Environmental group Greenpeace slammed next week's meeting as meaningless.
"As might be expected from a pact between six of the world's biggest coal exporters and users, this appears to be a deal to do nothing," the group said in a briefing statement. "At this stage, it contains no provisions to reduce greenhouse pollution. With no targets, timetables or even financial mechanisms, it can have no hope of meeting its stated objective — assisting the development and transfer of climate-friendly technology."

Earlier this week, James Connaughton, Chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said the partnership would drum up more private investment for goals including U.S. and Chinese plans to improve energy efficiency in coal-burning power plants and cut acid rain-causing sulfur dioxide emissions.
"I'd say that's wonderful news — and how will it be done?" said Flannery, responding to Connaughton's remarks.

Flannery said there is "no evidence in the world today" that a voluntary program to reduce greenhouse emissions could work. Only government regulation or "market-based instruments" — such as carbon taxes, incentives and government subsidies on green energy — would have the necessary impact, he said.
Frank Muller, a former adviser to U.S. President Bill Clinton and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, agrees.

"We need a price on carbon if its really going to drive investment, whether that's a carbon tax or emissions trading," he said. "You (also) need to address specific barriers to the adoption of existing (energy efficient) technologies."

see also:
Island Breath: Global Warming 5/6/04

hit tracker ounter Code --> er Code -->